Introduction
The report records a continuing and alarming escalation of grave breaches of international law in the occupied Palestinian territory. It presents a bleak picture of events during the month, whether in the Gaza Strip, where hostilities resumed, bringing massive destruction and loss of life, or in the West Bank and Jerusalem, where settlement, displacement and assaults persisted. In view of these facts, this article seeks to highlight the international‑legal framework governing such violations and to identify the responsibilities of the international community for ensuring accountability and preventing the perpetrators from enjoying impunity.
International‑Legal Framework Governing the Documented Violations
The violations documented in the March 2025 report fall within the scope of international humanitarian law and international human‑rights law. International humanitarian law, particularly the 1949 Geneva Conventions and their Additional Protocols, forms the primary framework regulating the conduct of parties during armed conflict and imposes clear obligations on the Occupying Power, Israel, toward the Palestinian civilian population and their property. International human‑rights law likewise remains applicable in the occupied Palestinian territory.
Many of the acts described in the report may rise to the level of war crimes and crimes against humanity as defined in the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, including:
– Wilful killing and indiscriminate attacks: The resumption of the war on Gaza on 18 March resulted in the martyrdom of 404 persons in the first hours, among them 170 children and 80 women. By the end of the month the toll had reached 1,163 martyrs and 2,735 wounded. In the West Bank, 19 persons were martyred, including children, women and prisoners. These acts violate the principles of distinction and proportionality in international humanitarian law.
–Targeting of protected personnel: The report notes the martyrdom of 1,402 medical workers, 111 civil‑defence personnel, 209 journalists and 409 aid workers—including 291 United Nations staff—since October 2023. On 23 March, eight Palestine Red Crescent Society staff, six civil‑defence members and one UNRWA staff member were killed. Targeting such categories is a war crime.
–Widespread destruction of civilian property: In Gaza, 499 school buildings were directly bombed, more than 1,000 mosques and three churches were destroyed, and 34 hospitals and 80 clinics were put out of service. In the West Bank, 106 Palestinian homes and structures were demolished, and hundreds of housing units in the northern camps were damaged. Such destruction cannot be justified by military necessity and constitutes a grave breach.
–Forced displacement: Israeli evacuation orders in Gaza displaced more than 280,000 persons. Continuing military operations in the northern West Bank displaced tens of thousands of camp residents. House demolitions in the West Bank rendered hundreds homeless.
–Settlement as a war crime: The transfer by the Occupying Power of parts of its civilian population into the territory it occupies is a war crime under the Rome Statute. The report records approvals for thousands of new housing units, attempts to establish new outposts, the “regularisation” of existing outposts and large budget allocations for settlement‑road projects aimed at annexing extensive areas of the West Bank.
–Obstruction of humanitarian aid: The Israeli authorities prevented thousands of aid and fuel trucks from entering Gaza and bombed aid‑distribution centres and bakeries. Starving civilians as a method of warfare is prohibited under international law.
–Arbitrary detention and inhuman treatment: During March Israel arrested 943 persons in the West Bank and Jerusalem, including children and women. The report notes the martyrdom of an imprisoned child in Israeli custody.
Responsibilities of the International Community
In the face of these documented violations, the international community, including individual states and international organisations, bears clear legal and moral responsibilities:
1-Duty to respect and ensure respect for international humanitarian law: Under Common Article 1 of the Geneva Conventions, the High Contracting Parties undertake not only to respect the Conventions but also to ensure respect for them in all circumstances. States are therefore obliged to take effective measures to halt violations and to hold perpetrators accountable.
2-Non‑recognition of the unlawful situation arising from violations: States must not recognise the legality of Israeli settlements or any territorial changes effected by force or other breaches of international law.
3-Co‑operation to end serious breaches: States must co‑operate to bring to an end serious violations of international law, including war crimes and crimes against humanity.
4-Support for international justice mechanisms:
-International Criminal Court (ICC): States Parties to the Rome Statute must provide full support to the ICC Prosecutor’s ongoing investigation into the situation in Palestine, including by supplying information and evidence and by providing the Court with the resources it requires.
-International Court of Justice (ICJ): States may draw upon the Court’s advisory opinions and support the implementation of its rulings relating to the Palestinian question.
-United Nations mechanisms: States should support the work of the Human Rights Council, Special Rapporteurs and UN commissions of inquiry in monitoring, documenting and making recommendations on the violations.
5-Activation of universal jurisdiction: States may, and in some cases must, prosecute perpetrators of grave international crimes before their national courts under the principle of universal jurisdiction, irrespective of where the crime was committed or the nationality of the perpetrators or victims.
6-Imposition of accountability measures: The international community may consider targeted sanctions against individuals and entities responsible for serious violations, including those involved in unlawful settlement activities.
7-Ensuring humanitarian access: The international community must exert pressure to guarantee the full, unimpeded delivery of humanitarian aid to the Gaza Strip and all areas in need.
8-Providing protection for the Palestinian people: The international community bears responsibility for working to afford effective protection to the Palestinian population under occupation, in accordance with international‑law obligations.
Challenges to Accountability
Despite the clarity of the legal framework and the responsibilities derived from it, accountability efforts face significant obstacles, foremost among them:
–Political considerations and lack of political will: The political and economic interests of certain states often override their legal and moral obligations, leading to double standards and undermining accountability efforts.
–Use of the veto in the Security Council: The exercise of the veto hampers the Council’s ability to take decisive action, including referral of the situation to the ICC or the imposition of sanctions.
–Non‑co‑operation by the Occupying Power: Israel’s refusal to co‑operate with many international investigative mechanisms hinders the comprehensive collection of evidence.
Conclusion
The violations documented in March 2025 are not mere numbers and statistics; they represent widespread human suffering and a stark challenge to the foundations of the international legal order. Allowing the perpetrators of these crimes to escape punishment encourages their continuation and undermines the credibility of international justice.
Accordingly, the international community must move beyond rhetoric to adopt concrete and effective measures. These must include full support for international criminal investigations, activation of national and international accountability mechanisms, and refusal to recognise the unlawful reality imposed by occupation and settlement policies. The collective responsibility to protect Palestinian civilians, guarantee their fundamental rights, end the occupation and achieve a just and lasting peace based on international law and relevant UN resolutions cannot be evaded.
End
